This is an awful tale that was caught on tape inside a Chicago supermarket. As one officer struggled for his life with an armed suspect, three others ran away to safety. The officer properly shot and killed the offender.We know we are not supermen and women. We know we should be careful and as safe as we can be but God only knows if we will somehow always overcome our natural fears to do our jobs. Not all of us are cut out to be cops. Overcautious cops are not that extraordinary but firing them is indeed very rare.
Two of the disgraced cops were recruit woman officers still within their probationary periods were fired and a third, a male officer who recently completed his probation is now facing action before the Chicago Police Board.
I have only one beef here and that is out of four officers sent to deal with a gunman three of them were not seasoned officers. This is like sending the blind to lead the blind. Another issue with some folks is that the two now fired probationary recruits are women. I’ve seen extraordinary courage in many women and cowardice in too many men.
When we hire man and women for police work they should be made of the right stuff. Three officers in Chicago did not measure up and need to find careers in some other field. I hope that the fired officers can get over the huge humiliation of their acts and move on to some other good and prosperous occupations where they don’t fail.
The Chicago Sun Times article is here.
Comments
There is perhaps no greater crime than leaving a brother officer to die.
Yellow bastards!
Our job is hard, we all know that. When civilians run away(as they should). It is our job to run towards it...and eliminate the problem.
We all know this job isn't for everyone. It's very hard at times. We deal with everything noone else wants to.
My question is...why are they hiring people who are so clearly unsuited for the job? It puts us all at risk.
The probies, who may have been in their first gunfight ever, were summarily dismissed, while the more experienced officer is getting full due process.
Yes, probationary employment is designed to give a swift exit to bad apples, but it is also supposed to be a period of training and counselling - not a one-strike-yer-out tightrope walk. The two probies could possibly be rehabilitated with retraining (which might include old-fashioned wall-to-wall peer counseling).
Lots of people have lost their composure in their first critical incident, then gone on to become seasoned warriors. Had there not been a 3:1 ratio of young to experienced officers - had the proportion been reversed - then an oldtimer could have grabbed the youngster by the scruff of the neck and put him/her back in the fight. As it was, the one experienced officer got decisively engaged early on, and the youngsters, with no one to lead them, reverted to instinct.
As previous commenters stated, it was as much a failure of the system as a failure of these individuals.
JM
Obviously you are not the POLICE. I am. I want none of the 3 anywhere near me when I work. We deal with enough everyday at work to worry about your back-up.
This job is inherently dangerous: Nobody was forced to take this job. This job is not for everyone. Unfortunately it took 3 (2x F/1 1 x M/1) COWARDS to put an Officer's life in danger to bring this issue to the forefront.
Is this shocking? NO!
I applaud Supt. CLINE.
Second, they weren't sent to a "man with a gun" call. They were sent to a shoplifter call.
Both points being made, we fully support the firings by the Superintendent and the filing of charges for termination on the third officer. No one is taught to run from trouble as a police officer. An investigation will find that this was out and out cowardice, not a "tactical retreat" and return in force.
The good news is the officer that was endangered followed his training and is alive as a result.