 |
Washington, DC—The basic
Human Rights Protections given to us through the blood of patriots and tyrants in
the Bill of Rights are all but dead.
Should you try and obtain a
copy of the simple and plain English version by an Internet search it will be quite
a challenge. Instead you will get
paraphrased versions with lots of “explanations” by so-called legal scholars.
The actual text is far too
dangerous to publish. People would
certainly be “misled” into believing our government has become lawless and
tyrannical.
Essentially the Far Left Wing
of our academia all want us to believe that the words don’t mean what they say. They want us to accept that only intellectually
superior people like them can understand simple words.
The authors of our Bill of
Right deliberately made tampering with this important human rights document
very difficult. A simple majority vote
cannot change our Constitution.
The Left Wing hates our
Constitution and Bill of Rights simply because it is a solid bar to Socialism
and Communism.
The United States Supreme Court is made of
men and women who are appointed by presidents for life. They are appointed more for partisan reasons rather than their sound legal abilities.
The Court is politically divided much like our population.
As for the Bill of Rights,
the task of our courts is to use it to protect us from
government tyranny. They too often fail
in that important mission. Instead they constantly
attempt to redefine the text allowing for tyranny.
Our courts have allowed for
the abolition of free speech, gun rights and have decimated our rights against
unreasonable search and seizure.
After a decade or seven the
Supreme Court may review a lower court finding and reestablish a right like
they did with the McDonald and Heller gun cases. In effect a lower court can suspend our
rights and if we are lucky some time before we die our rights may be returned
by our Supreme Court.
In one strange case Roe v
Wade the Supreme Court somehow wrote us a new right, the Right to Privacy. Apparently this new right only applies to
women and their physicians on obtaining abortions.
Without taking a position on
abortion rights or the warm and fuzzy PC term, the Right to Choose I can’t
imagine how the court could do this in an intellectually honest way. The Court in effect took a lawless short cut
to amend the Constitution.
I can’t tell you how many
legal professors, politicians or self-described legal experts have made
speeches extolling the virtues of the Bill of Rights and then unceremoniously
attacked them.
The Left Wing has invented
rhetoric that may sound legally plausible but is pure hogwash. They tell us the Constitution is a “living
document” that evolves with popular notions of today’s politics. They also tell us our rights “Must be
balanced against the collective security needs of the masses.” Collectivism is what Communism and Socialism is all about.
I love it when I hear cops,
prosecutors and judges say that times have changed, or that in a “Post 9/11
World” we must do things differently.
I guess that they forgot that
the Bill of Rights was the direct result of The Revolutionary War. They forgot that we have had a Civil War and
two World Wars and that compared, 9/11 is an insignificant event! We never once found the need to amend the
Bill of Rights the proper way!
The serious threat of
sabotage during our wars never before led to a group of uniformed lawless
government thugs like our TSA.
Our Bill of Rights is dead
because people have simply accepted the constant watering down of their human
rights. They never get it until they are
victimized personally when its way too late to do anything.
Comments