Skip to main content

They strung him up now what?

A bunch of bloodthirsty Muslims tried and now have hanged their vicious fellow Muslim, Saddam Hussein. So what was the advantage? How is anyone better off?

When Hussein was in charge people died in acts of revenge and downright wanton murder. Hussein was in the jug for the last three years and now has been tied up and hanged while bloodthirsty Muslims never stopped killing each other at the same or a greater rate.

We wanted Hussein dead because of Crimes Against Humanity. Since when have Muslims been humane to anyone, let alone each other? If that’s the reason to Hang Hussein there is not enough rope to hang all the other Muslims that deserve the same fate.

Talk about an impossible mission, pacifying Muslims is truly unattainable. Why are we trying to deal with this wild bunch of cutthroats? They are only doing what’s natural for them.

I don’t support the Bolshevik politicians that hate George Bush but I don’t want one more American kid killed or maimed in Iraq. I say bring them home so the natural population control there can resume. The fewer Muslims on this earth make things safer for everyone else.

I only have one question. Had we not invaded Iraq would Iraq have gotten into another war with Iran and caused elimination of many more violent Muslims? I think that would have been a much better solution to have several million fewer Muslims.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The cookie-pushing lace pants in the US State Dept and spineless political hacks in the CIA dont have the testicular fortitude to do the right thing in dealing with these nutjobs...My question is this: why did US military forces turn over Saddam Hussein to the Al-Sadr terrorist group??Are these the same terrorists that have been killing our soldiers for 3 years now?These goofs will only view this as a sign of weakness on our part and will be emboldened by it,and increase their attacks on our troops.
Prejudice you say? With my tongue in cheek I say, “Not at all! Just let those rabid Muslim bastards do to each other what comes natural.”
Anonymous said…
Crimefile: I often find myself agreeing with you despite my more left-leaning inclinations. I agree that we have no business dumping American lives and money in that corner of the world, and that the lynching of Saddam will do nothing to fix the mess we've found ourselves in over there. But I have to take issue with this post. First of all, you characterize Muslims as bloodthirsty and I don't think that's accurate or fair. SOME Muslims use their faith as an outlet for grievances that are really political, social, or economic. MOST Muslims would rather live in peace and be left alone. Unfortunately, the US shares a large part of the blame for the instability in that part of the world.

Second, Islamic fundamentalism does not have a monopoly on religious violence. How about Eric Rudolph and the other abortion clinic bombers? What about that lunatic pastor from Kansas Fred Phelps, who welcomes the death of US soldiers and victims of terrorism as God's punishment for not persecuting homosexuals enough? What about General William Boykin, who has gone on record framing the war on terror as a final confrontation with the Infidel? Even without religious motives, we Americans can be pretty bloodthirsty ourselves, as our crime rates, support for capital punishment, and love of violent entertainment suggests.

Thirdly, not all Muslims share the same ethnicity or culture. To say that Iraqis and Iranians are the same just because they are Muslim overlooks the fact that they have entirely different histories. Iranians, aka Persians, are Indo-Europeans, and are descended from the same people that most white Americans are. Comparing an Arab Iraqi to a Persian or a Turk would be less accurate than comparing a Spaniard to a Finn just because they are both Christian.

Finally, it seems a little strange to endorse the wholesale slaughter of Muslims (no matter who does the slaughtering) as a means of reducing bloodshed.
Anonymous said…
You (yes, "you" because it's your goverment, freely elected, and you live in a democracy) hanged Saddam and ask "now what?"... well, according to USAmerica tradition I'd say you have at least two more guys to hang see this article in www.globalresearch.ca

Popular posts from this blog

Chicago Cops Slammed with Sudden Ban on the Sig/Sauer P320—And the Officers Will Pay thePrice

In a move that’s rocking the rank and file, the Chicago Police Department has abruptly banned the use of the once-trusted Sig/Sauer P320 pistol as an authorized duty weapon. The order came down swiftly, leaving thousands of officers scrambling. The official reason? Alarming reports that the weapon can fire without the trigger being pulled. For years now the gun-maker has brushed off horror stories about negligent discharges, usually blaming human error. After all, it’s easier to blame the gun than admit to a deadly mistake. Just think back to Alec Baldwin’s tragic shooting on a New Mexico movie set—he insisted he never pulled the trigger, yet a woman lost her life. But experts were quick to point out that the revolver in question simply doesn’t fire on its own. This, however, isn’t Hollywood. The Sig Sauer P320 has a documented pattern of discharges—many occurring while holstered. Lawsuits are piling up, and the manufacturer continues to deny fault, but the incidents are too numerou...

A 40 Caliber Nightmare Is Caught On Tape.

So you’re confident that that .40 caliber S&W service round will keep you safe. Maybe you’ll have second thoughts after you see this video. One hot summer night in 1994 Tempe and Mesa Arizona police were involved in a pursuit with this suspect who ran into a stranger’s apartment to hide after being shot TWICE in the chest. He was shirtless and you can see the blood pumping out of those two wounds. What’s really frightening is just how agile this fellow is as he struts to the ambulance. If he was not handcuffed and had a knife or a gun, ask yourself if he could still hurt you, your partner or a hostage? If your jurisdiction demands that officers carry either the 9MM or the .40 Caliber S&W it’s time to show this video to your bosses and lobby to have the .45 ACP round authorized. The switch may well reduce the screaming by self-appointed community activists about how many rounds police had to use on a suspect. The really talented and courageous video journalist, Karen Ke...

America Will See Its Worst Race Riot Yet This Summer

Star Prosecution Witness, Rachel Jeantel Sanford, FL —Yes, the George Zimmerman trial here has thousands of African-Americans getting ready for some serious bloodletting. I don’t want to make idle and dire predictions but this nation has never been so divided and racially sensitive.  Our African-American President took sides on this case at the very beginning.  That ratified a George Zimmerman guilty verdict in the minds of millions. There’s just one little problem, and that is the murder case should have never been filed.  It was filed purely for political reasons despite the fact that it was a simple justifiable homicide.  Zimmerman was on the block watch lookout program and followed a suspicious Trayvon Martin after he used an improper entrance to a gated community.  Zimmerman was acting as the eyes and ears of the Sanford Police Department. Martin did not like being followed and knew that he could easily beat up the out-of-shape...