Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence and Government Regulation: A Disaster In Progress


Artificial intelligence is moving at warp speed, and that is exactly why the government is already reaching for the leash.

AI is answering questions, solving problems, improving medicine, sharpening engineering, accelerating research, and giving ordinary people access to knowledge and capability that used to belong only to institutions, corporations, universities, and government agencies. In plain English, AI is power. And for the average citizen, it is also freedom.

That, of course, is where the trouble begins.

Government has never been fond of a self-sufficient citizen. A man who can think, research, write, build, investigate, learn, and solve problems without begging permission is a very dangerous creature to the bureaucratic mind. Bureaucrats do not want citizens empowered. They want citizens processed, licensed, approved, delayed, stamped, denied, and forced to come crawling back to some taxpayer-funded desk jockey for permission to function. AI threatens that racket.

For the first time in history, the common man can sit at a kitchen table and access tools that can help him draft legal documents, understand medical research, start a business, investigate fraud, learn new skills, translate languages, design systems, analyze evidence, and challenge official nonsense. That is not merely convenient. That is revolutionary.

Naturally, the political class will call this “dangerous.”  Not dangerous because criminals might misuse it. Criminals misuse everything. Cars, phones, knives, computers, gasoline, banks, and the Internet itself. We already have laws for fraud, threats, extortion, theft, hacking, stalking, terrorism, and every other dirty trick in the criminal toolbox. If someone uses AI to commit a crime, prosecute the crime. Simple. Even Congress could understand that after three hearings and a catered lunch.

The real fear is not criminal use. The real fear is citizen use.

AI gives ordinary people the ability to bypass gatekeepers. That is what terrifies government. It weakens dependency. It reduces the need to bow before credentialed experts, political fixers, agency clerks, and professional permission-givers. It lets people ask questions without waiting for approved answers. It lets citizens challenge narratives. It gives the little guy a tool that the big boys would rather keep locked in the corporate and government vault.

I view access to AI the same way I view the Second Amendment. It is a tool made by man, and every free person has a natural right to possess and use tools. The government has no moral authority to ban a hammer because someone might use it as a weapon. It has no moral authority to ban a printing press because someone might publish lies. And it has no moral authority to strangle AI because citizens might become too capable for comfort.

Yes, harmful use should be punished. Fraud is fraud. Threats are threats. Theft is theft. Criminal conduct does not become legal because a computer helped someone do it. But regulating the tool itself because of what someone might do with it is the same tired authoritarian trick dressed up in a lab coat.

We can plainly see the script already forming.

Politicians, especially those who believe government should supervise every breath you take, will demand licenses, approvals, restrictions, “safety boards,” compliance rules, access controls, approved-user categories, and probably some bloated federal AI agency staffed by people who could not program a coffee maker. They will claim they are protecting the public. They always do. Protection is the lullaby tyrants sing while they pick your pocket.

Self-sufficiency and collectivist control cannot coexist. A citizen with powerful tools is harder to herd. A citizen who can research, analyze, create, and challenge authority is harder to fool. And a citizen who no longer needs to kiss the ring of some bureaucrat becomes, in the eyes of government, a problem to be managed.

So here is the prediction: whatever the government does to “regulate” artificial intelligence will soon become a disaster for personal liberty.

They will not stop the criminals. They will not stop foreign enemies. They will not stop bad actors with resources, money, and technical skill. Those people will find their way around the rules like rats through a sewer pipe.

The people who will be stopped are the honest citizens. The small business owner. The student. The investigator. The writer. The inventor. The disabled veteran trying to navigate a system designed by sadists. The ordinary American who wants one fair shot at using the most powerful knowledge tool ever created.  That is who regulation will punish.

Artificial intelligence does not need to be locked away by government. It needs to remain in the hands of free people. Punish crimes. Punish fraud. Punish harm. But do not let politicians use fear as an excuse to seize the future and sell it back to us one permit at a time.

Because when government says, “We’re here to regulate innovation for your safety,” what it usually means is this:  Freedom has become too efficient, and they intend to fix that.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A 40 Caliber Nightmare Is Caught On Tape.

So you’re confident that that .40 caliber S&W service round will keep you safe. Maybe you’ll have second thoughts after you see this video. One hot summer night in 1994 Tempe and Mesa Arizona police were involved in a pursuit with this suspect who ran into a stranger’s apartment to hide after being shot TWICE in the chest. He was shirtless and you can see the blood pumping out of those two wounds. What’s really frightening is just how agile this fellow is as he struts to the ambulance. If he was not handcuffed and had a knife or a gun, ask yourself if he could still hurt you, your partner or a hostage? If your jurisdiction demands that officers carry either the 9MM or the .40 Caliber S&W it’s time to show this video to your bosses and lobby to have the .45 ACP round authorized. The switch may well reduce the screaming by self-appointed community activists about how many rounds police had to use on a suspect. The really talented and courageous video journalist, Karen Ke...

The origin of the feature film, COME FRIDAY…

CLick On the pictures to see full size versions. Long ago there was a young lady I had the hots for in a big way (Yes, I know that hots is not a word). She was pretty, incredibly bright, and had some real elegance about her. She had a love for children and basic kindness that you don’t often see in someone her age. I met her parents and could understand she came from a much more stable home than mine. I was raised by a single, welfare mom and suddenly found myself way out-classed. For whatever reasons things did not workout they way I had hoped. Sadly for me, we went on our separate ways. From time to time I’d run into this lady in various places where our job had taken us. Whenever this happened my heart would skip a beat or two. I left my hometown Chicago, and moved to Arizona where I founded my detective agency. As a private eye and soon a TV news producer too, my career took me to the highest profile criminal events in Arizona and throughout the country. There’s no question that ...

Tyranny, Government Corruption and Democide

Americans like to think they are exceptional. Yet most couldn’t tell you the first thing about how governments, like clockwork, repeat the same bloody cycles of tyranny and collapse. Everyone assumes the Nazis hold the crown for worst government in history. Sure, Hitler’s crew were sadistic thugs who industrialized murder. But “the worst”? Not even close. They just happened to do their killing during a time when cameras, film, and bureaucratic obsession with record-keeping made their atrocities impossible to hide. If Goebbels had been working with the technology of Genghis Khan, you’d barely have a postcard left to prove it. History is littered with tyrants who weren’t so kind as to leave photo albums of their mass murders. The Turks tried to erase the Armenians. Stalin starved Ukraine into submission during the Holodomor, then doubled down by purging his own people until the bodies stacked higher than Lenin’s promises. Mao made Stalin look like an amateur, turning his “Great Leap F...