Los Angeles, CA — California is ground zero for oppressive and unconstitutional gun laws that flagrantly violate the Second Amendment. In this state, the constitutional right to bear arms is practically non-existent, buried under layers of government overreach. However, the tide is turning. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in  New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen , 597 U.S. ___, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), has affirmed that the Second Amendment means what it says—and that it cannot be endlessly “balanced” against vague claims of public safety. The future will see most of California’s draconian gun laws wiped from the books. Gun Dealers Before and After the 1968 Gun Control Act Before the Gun Control Act of 1968, firearms were sold like any other lawful product. No special licenses were required, no federal purchase forms, and no waiting periods. You could buy a firearm in person, by mail, or from a neighbor without jumping through bureaucratic hoops. So long as t...

  Taylor Swift is undeniably an impressive business phenomenon. She has built a remarkable empire that few in the music industry could hope to replicate. There’s no denying she’s charming, with a pleasant but mediocre voice and an ever-evolving wardrobe that keeps her young, devoted audience captivated. When it comes to songwriting, she’s no Cole Porter, Burt Bacharach, or Carole King. Personally, none of her songs have left me humming along, which, I must admit, is something of a relief. On the visual front, however, Swift deserves an A. Her concerts are a spectacle of showmanship and creativity, showcasing her as a powerful example of the American dream in action. I applaud her for that. Still, I can’t quite grasp how her overall package has inspired such an immense global following. One misstep, in my view, was her political endorsement of Kamala Harris, which risked alienating part of her audience. Yet, I have no doubt she will weather that storm. After all, her empire is vast,...

Washington, DC — This is an agency that has become bloated, unnecessary, and tyrannical.     They have taken their statutory authority and unlawfully embellished it destroying many lives in the process.   To begin with they have been given powers by our politicians that were 100% contrary to the language and tradition of the Bill of Rights .     Then various ATF directors goaded on by gun rights, hating politicians engaged in horrific acts, some of the more notable are: 1. Ken Ballew Raid (1971) Kenneth Ballew, a gun collector, was raided by ATF agents in his Silver Spring, Maryland apartment. The agents suspected him of possessing unregistered grenades. During the raid, Ballew, who had been bathing, armed himself with an antique revolver, believing his home was under attack. When the agents, dressed in plain clothes, forcibly entered, Ballew was shot in the head, leaving him permanently disabled. Investigations later revealed that the suspected grenades were in...

Legal troubles can be daunting, especially when you can’t afford an attorney. But in today’s world, artificial intelligence (AI) has opened up new possibilities for those who need legal help without the hefty price tag. With the right guidance, AI can assist in creating the legal documents you need with professional precision—no lawyer required! Imagine having instant access to professionally prepared documents just by knowing the right prompts to ask AI. With carefully worded questions, you can generate everything from wills and trusts to civil complaints, motions, responses, and even simple no-fault divorce documents. For straightforward cases, AI can be your personal assistant in the legal realm, quickly drafting the documents that otherwise might cost you thousands of dollars in fees. But AI’s power doesn’t end with document creation. If you know how to ask, it can guide you step-by-step through the legal process, offering insight into arguments, strategies, and procedures. It’s li...

  Journalism is about simply gathering and reporting the facts. However our legacy corporate mainstream media had a goal and it was to denounce Donald Trump anyway in every way that they possibly could. They pulled no punches whenever anyone doubted the 2020 election they would simply be called liars.     That is despite the fact that no court would actually allow the examination of ballots.     So really you’re looking at two sides of a guessing game.     The Media does not know what the facts really are here, but they gambled their entire reputation on claiming there was absolutely no voter fraud. Every chance that the media had to denounce, Donald Trump was fully exercised.     Orange man bad what is the common theme no matter what TV channel you were watching or what newspaper you were reading.     Then there were the nighttime TV talk shows and of course, that ridiculous daytime dumpster fire trash show called The View. It has ...

Kamala Harris’s campaign was as aimless as the fabled lost Dutchman ghost ship, drifting with no course, no solutions, and empty promises to fix what her administration had already failed to address over the last three and a half years. She presented no real plan, leaving us with the grim certainty that her administration would continue on the same disastrous path we had already suffered through. Even the Hollywood celebrities she paraded around could barely rally their own followers, let alone real supporters of Harris. It was painfully clear that they weren’t fans of her, just hired faces. And it was hard to ignore Harris’s inability to string together coherent thoughts without a Teleprompter, as if drug abuse might explain her struggles to communicate. She could only recite short talking points in her infamous word salads. If she had won, it’s doubtful she would have been in control; it would likely be the same unelected insiders pulling the strings, just as they have with dementia-...

The fact is these rights were crafted to be absolute.  Until early in the 20th century, they were absolute and then things changed. The concept that rights are not absolute, particularly in the context of the Bill of Rights, was famously articulated by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in the case  Schenck v. United States , 249 U.S. 47 (1919). In his opinion, Holmes wrote, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.” This statement marked one of the earliest and most influential judicial crossroads that this certain right—specifically the First Amendment right to free speech—is not absolute and may have limitations under specific circumstances. The  Schenck case was later used extensively to gut the second amendment along with search and seizure and due  process rights.  Weighing public safety and modern times simply became an accepted method that brought o...

Decades ago, New York’s Madison Avenue advertising agencies discovered a powerful truth: repetition in messaging has a profound and lasting effect on the human mind. The more frequently a message is shared, the more likely people are to believe it, eventually accepting the products being promoted as the best. This perception is often an illusion, yet people spend their money on these products, sometimes even if they have no need for them. Children are especially vulnerable to advertising. They quickly develop loyalty to brand names they hear repeatedly on television, even requesting medications they see advertised, believing these products will solve their imagined problems. Adults, often without realizing it, also start favoring whatever brands or ideas they’re exposed to through propaganda or advertising. One of the masterminds behind the use of propaganda was Joseph Goebbels, Adolf Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, who famously said, “If you tell a lie often enough, it becomes the tr...

The election is over, but the war against President-elect Donald Trump is far from cooling down. In fact, it’s only heating up as t he coup d'é·tat continues.    As we approach a critical date—the so-called “hush money” sentencing on November 26—it’s clear that the deep-state efforts to block Trump haven’t slowed; they’re accelerating. Let’s be clear: this isn’t just politics as usual. We are witnessing what amounts to a well-orchestrated coup. Democrats, led by partisan operatives like Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, are doing everything in their power to twist and weaponize the legal system against Trump. Here’s the playbook: the Biden Justice Department had previously investigated this case and declined to prosecute. That alone should tell us something. But Bragg, a staunch Democrat operative, took matters into his own hands, bending and distorting the law to push for an indictment. And where? In Manhattan—hardly neutral ground—where a show trial with a hostile jur...

  As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to appoint a new Attorney General, the nominee will receive confirmation from the Republican-majority Senate. This appointment could have significant implications for how the Department of Justice (DOJ) approaches the defense of federal gun control laws currently facing legal challenges in the courts. Traditionally, the DOJ defends federal statutes when challenged. However, there have been notable exceptions; for instance, the DOJ opted not to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) during the Obama administration, arguing it was unconstitutional.  A similar scenario may arise with federal gun laws, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in  New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen , 597 U.S. ___ (2022). The  Bruen  ruling set a higher constitutional bar for upholding firearm regulations, mandating that any restrictions must align with the Second Amendment’s text, history, and t...

It’s time for Donald Trump if elected to act decisively and grant immediate, full pardons to Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Chelsea Manning. These individuals are not criminals; they are heroes who risked everything to expose the deep-rooted corruption and abuses of the American government—revelations that all Americans have the right to know. Assange, an Australian journalist, simply exercised his right to publish the truth through WikiLeaks, standing firmly on First Amendment principles. His only “crime” was revealing to the world what the U.S. government wanted to hide. Snowden, a government contractor, blew the whistle on the NSA’s sweeping, illegal mass surveillance of American citizens, exposing how our own government was secretly intercepting and storing our private phone calls and Internet communications. Manning, a United States Army soldier, courageously followed her conscience, providing Assange with key evidence of government misconduct and upholding the spirit of the ...