Police work is dangerous. Life and death decisions must be made in split seconds. Survival dictates that if cops error they do so on the side of self-protection at the expense of suspected offenders. There are no second place winners in gunfights.
We are an unforgiving society when our cops make mistakes involving their own survival. An error on the side of survival can sometimes cause a good cop to be disgraced, fired and even imprisoned. Political or racial overtones sometimes can set justice aside and destroy the lives of honorable cops.
Cops by their basic nature are the good guys. They chose a life where they can protect their friends and neighbors from harm. Background checks before hiring and a strict program of observation during training and a probationary period work to insure only the good guys can wear the police star.
No matter what view you take of this case, it’s as ugly as ugly can get. It’s a story about a deadly battle between who we like to call, the good guys.
It all happened on February 21, 2005, on a near, South side Chicago Street. Beat officers on routine patrol observed a moving vehicle with its headlights off just before 1:00 a.m. This is an area where whores and drugs can be found. Officers are rightly on their toes when making stops of anyone in this neighborhood at night.
What happens next is anyone’s guess if you choose to believe the good guys. The problem is they’re all good guys here. The patrol officers pull over the offending driver, Howard Morgan. In a flash Morgan is shot 25 times by the patrol officers. Two patrol officers are also shot. Presumably, Howard Morgan shot them.
Howard Morgan, 51, is also a cop. Morgan was a Chicago police officer who after eight years abandoned that position over a requirement that all Chicago police officers live within that city’s boundaries. Morgan secured a well paying position as a railroad cop that would let him live wherever he wanted. Morgan has no known criminal history.
One of the unspoken but real perks of being a cop is an end to receiving citations for traffic infractions. Traffic stops between cops are really more like a social visit. Unless the offending cops is drunk, combative or involved in other criminal activity such a stop would never make the Six O’clock News.
The official police version came from Pat Camden the Chicago police spokesman. The mêlée began when Morgan identified himself as a cop as he was being frisked. Camden said, Morgan pulled his semi-automatic pistol and fired it at the officers and the officers returned fire.
The officers returned a lot of fire. 25 rounds struck Howard Morgan. This is not surprising considering the Chicago Police Department insisted their officers carry a really weak choice of a nine millimeter service round. These bullets are incredibly ineffective for police work.
What’s missing from this story? Let’s begin with a motive. Try as I might I can’t think of one here. Did Morgan simply snap without reason? That’s just not likely. No drugs, whores or other criminal evidence has ever surfaced in this mix.
What about intoxication? Were drugs or alcohol is Morgan’s bloodstream? Yes they did examine Morgan’s blood for these things. The results of such testing have not yet surfaced. I would expect that if the tests were positive that information would have made the news for sure.
Howard spent nearly a year in the Cook County jail unable to post the 10% requirement of his $2 million-dollar bond. That all changed when an anonymous donor provided nearly the entire bail amount. Emotions ran high on both side of this mess as Morgan was allowed to wait for his day in court at home. I don’t think Morgan who is still recovering from his injuries is a flight risk.
This case may seem to be fueled by race issues, but I don’t think that’s the case here. Only the participants of this encounter know whatever really happened. No matter who was right, or wrong, everyone involved regrets the result.
Crimefile will be watching these case and reporting new developments.
WMAQ-TV report: http://www.nbc5.com/news/5840876/detail.html?z=dp&dpswid=2265994&dppid=65193
Update: 1/27/12 Seven years after the shooting a retrial ended convicting Morgan. I don't think he will live to see freedom again. From the FOP Lodge 7 Website: For a second day in a row, in separate cases, a Cook County Jury listened to the evidence presented by ASAs Dan Groth and Phyllis Warren and delivered justice for our own. Howard Morgan was found guilty this evening on all counts for the attempted murders of Officers John Wrigley, Tim Finley, Eric White and Nick Olsen.
Comments
This does not make sense but I have to side with the working cops. I won't feel bad if a jury lets Morgan off the hook though.
This is sad event for the department.
Railroad police have a REAL union and are paid very well. They have a lot less BS to put up with along the way.
I'm reading the remarks abut suspected bad conduct prior to the stop but where is the evidence? If it exists I want to know!
Anyway, I want to believe the city coppers, except they lit up a railroad copper! What happened here? Who lost their mind(s)? The railroad copper or the city coppers? Or both? Or was it a big misunderstanding that really went too far? I'd like to think it was that, but I have to say, I JUST DON'T KNOW! The courts will have to sort this out. As a city copper myself, I just want the truth, good, bad or indifferant.
Be safe
The fact of the matter is that Morgan, at some point during the course of the stop, produced a weapon in a manner that caused the officers to fear for their life. It was at this point that they began shooting. I find it hard to believe that several Chicago Police Officers would simply shoot a man for no reason. And you, as a former CPD Officer shouldn't even be questioning these facts.
Apparently you have been influnenced by the media spin put on this story. Howard Morgan is a piece of human shit who, but for our crappy ammo, should have died on the street that night for shooting "fellow" officers.
Unfortunately, he survived and the officers will now be crucified for following their training and doing their job.
Let me ask you this. . . If the Officers in question had been killed that night by Morgan, would we even be having this conversation? The answer is no. Because they survived, their injuries are classified by the media as "minor". The reality is that no GSW is minor. I don't know if you've ever been shot, but I assure you its not a pleasurable experience.
Howard Morgan is a would-be cop killer who got less than what he deserved for his actions!
Thats all well and good, but how much heroin/crack selling and other assorted crimes occur on Rush street when you go there? There is no comparison between your going to Rush St. and his being on the west side.
I can't recall except one time were a former or current ever shot or tried to shoot another cop during a police stop or enforcement event. That one time, was in the early 1980s when some ex-Michigan cop was drunk and acting up in the Marina City bar one night. The drunken ex-cop was asked to leave the bar by Chicago Police Deputy Supt. Jim Reardon who was off duty and lived in the building. Reardon's star is in the lobby star case at 35th Avenue.
The Morgan case is VERY STRANGE! Anybody that knowingly pulls a gun on a cop deserves to be shot. Someone please give me a motive.
Tell me Morgan was drunk or under the influence of some drug. Tell me that Morgan has a history of acting up during traffic stops. Tell me he was involved in some other criminal activity that night. Please anybody, tell me anything that makes sense about this case?
Reardon seemed friendly to everyone and unless you knew he was a cop or CPD boss it was never mentioned. I don't know many details about this since I had already left Chicago by then...
You want disclosure? So do we.
Crimefile, are you, in anyway being employed by, or paid by, or compensated in any fashion by Howard Morgan, the Morgan family, estate, legal team, or anonymous donor, or anyone else involved with him or this case?
Crimefile, have you had any contact with Howard Morgan, the Morgan family, estate, legal team, or anonymous donor, or anyone else involved with him or this case prior to, or after the incident in question?
I could possibly be convinced to take the case on, however I don't anticipate that happening.
If that was to somehow happen, I would discontinue posting anything on that story.
I did put in a call to Sam Adam for information. He chose not to return my call so far.
I'm watching from the cheap seats on this one...
I suspect that there are conflicting versions of what happened. I know that the beat coppers stories are locked in by their reports.
Case reports are always open to impeachment evidence should there be any. Morgan should have been smart enough and not talked to anyone by invoking his Fifth Amendment rights. If he blabbed his statements are subject to the same kind of impeachment.
I think I would try reducing each version of the shooting to video re-enactment and perhaps try to offer an animation video to the jury.
I'd venture to say in the heat of the moment time and space went to Hell and if everyone told that they really believed to be true they'd all still get it all wrong. That kind of close combat gives way to all sorts of peculiar mental phenomenon.
I’d also offer that without a motive, confession or some real physical evidence this is definitely a winnable case for the defense on the issue of reasonable doubt. That State is going to have an uphill battle to prove its case.
An acquittal does not mean that Morgan did not do what he’s accused of doing except in a legal sense.
I knew Deputy Supt. James D. Riordan only well enough to say hi when we passed in the lobby of Marina City.
I would recommend that no officer speaks to him or posts anything that may involve a criminal or civil matter.
However, I could believe that this was a big case of "oh shit" and things spiraled out of control. To that end, I'd have to side with the on-duty police. On-duty police always win out over the off-duty coppers.
I was once taken out of a car at gunpoint. My car was a close description of a robbery offender, and the orders to exit the vehicle were complied with. I laid on the ground and was handcuffed. THEN I told the coppers I was the police. they grabbed my ID and my gun and stood me up, put me in their car and checked things out. Within minutes I was uncuffed with ID and gun returned, along with an unnecessary apology.
It would appear, not knowing all the facts, that Morgan should have done the same. The trial will hopefully bring all the facts to light.
Anonymous said...
I do not trust Crimefile. His interest in the Howard Morgan case goes beyond "watching for the cheap seats" (his own words).
I would recommend that no officer speaks to him or posts anything that may involve a criminal or civil matter. 10:33 AM
I won't delete this mildly insulting post because I respect caution. Again, I’m not in any way involved in any aspect of this case for any party, interested person or witness.
As you guys can tell I'm always looking for a good movie to produce. The Morgan case as it stands no matter the outcome is not such a case.
I have my eyes, ears and mind open for anything to develop on this one.
It's a case of strange that we hope never happens no matter how we view this. Police academies all over the country will be giving this example to recruits.
9:13 AM
Riordan was unarmed when gunned down, as in murdered. If you don't know anything about the case then shut the **** up. Typical ******** copper implying that because he was a boss things were covered up. Go **** yourself.
8:58 PM
I edited out the bad words from the above post...
I heard the story from a life long copper friend (from the old Loop Traffic Unit)who was on the scene that night. My pal was also a Marina City tenant and there's no question that 1st. Deputy Supt. James D. Riordan was murdered by the drunken ex-cop. Riordan was a class act and a good guy.
I
Morgan lived and now the truth must be determined to see if he’s innocent or a criminal deserving to be in prison for life. I hope Morgan is not railroaded just to protect the career and pensions of the Chicago officers involved. The sad part of this case is there’s no middle ground.