There are lingering questions on the origin of Barack Obama. The questions have been never been answered and all efforts to expose the records to sunlight have been stonewalled.
There is a mountain of evidence that indicates Obama was a foreign student allowed into the USA on a foreign visa and there's student loan issues. There is also the question of his travel where an American passport simply does not allow entry. Obama’s own paternal grandmother publically proclaimed her pride in her grandson she watched being born in a Kenya hospital.
The actual Obama birth certificate does not exist or is under wraps but Hawaiian state generated document does. The validity of that document can only be determined with a real birth certificate.
So far Obama has spent over a million dollars to keep the telling records sealed from prying American eyes. The courts have denied standing for plaintiffs suing to challenge Obama’s constitutional qualification as a natural born citizen. So far the Courts have protected Obama’s secrets.
The only rationale to hide the documents is that they would result in Obama’s immediate ouster and the unraveling of every act and appointment he authorized as President. The real reason to hide these records is beyond obvious. That’s not a small motive to hide the truth from America.
After the midterm elections the Obama forces in congress will be the minority. That will allow for subpoenas to cut through the fog on this and so many other issues.
I guess we must expect large scale race riots in every large city if Obama is disqualified. We cannot have special laws for African-American politicians and those of other races. We will have to deal with whatever develops.
I’m convinced the birth issue will be settled in a way against Obama’s interests well before his four-year term expires. That is unless the expected Chicago style corruption Obama’s been involved with does not get him first.
Right now my money is on Obama’s ouster within the next 18 months. I for one won’t miss the treason and intrigue involved in Obama's failed Communist revolution.
Comments
The bar application is a multi-page form much like the background investigation forms we filled out to join the CPD. It asks lots of personal questions.
I'm guessing that, on his admissions and financial aid application, he lied about his birthplace to get preferential admissions treatment and financial aid.
His transcripts would be interesting too. Were his grades and LSAT score high enough to get into Harvard Law School legitimately, or did he have some type of help?
Another interesting tidbit: He took a July Illinois bar exam. Everybody else who passed the exam was sworn in in a mass ceremony on the same day in November. He was not sworn in until December. Why? Something in his character and fitness (background) investigation?
Why advertise that you have a "transparant" administration and then seal your records via an Executive Order they day after you seize power??
Paul, I sure hope you’re right about Obama not doing the four years. But there’s really nothing to settle. It’s already settled. Obama is not a “Natural Born” citizen, and IS NOT constitutionally eligible to hold the office of POTUS.
Despite the insurmountable evidence to the contrary, let’s give Obama the benefit of the doubt and say he was born here, and not in Mombasa like his grandmama said. Because where he was born is actually irrelevant, unless of course, after we remove him from the office he’s illegally occupying and criminally prosecute him for treason, we want to deport him for being an illegal alien after he finishes serving a long prison sentence too. That’d be kinda cold, even for me!
At this point, it’s quite apparent that Obama’s not going to give up any long form birth certificates or school records as long as he’s in power, but that’s OK, we really don’t need them. Because the most damning evidence against Obama that I know of so far, has been Obama’s own admission that his father was Kenyan, and is also listed as African on the (fabricated) Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) that has been published all over the internet for the past few years.
By virtue of his father being a Kenyan at the time of baby Obammies birth, that makes him the same nationality as his father, which in 1961, would have been a “British Subject”……no matter where he was born. And I’m sure you’ve heard, “Once a Brit, always a Brit!” But if in fact, and that’s a BIG IF, he was born in one of the two different hospitals he claims as his birthplace in Hawaii, he would be considered a “Native Born” citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment, not a “Natural Born” citizen, as required under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States. And being born on American soil with a parent that is a British Subject, he would also be considered a dual citizen, who would still be entitled to all the same rights and privileges in this country as any other American citizen, but just couldn’t ever legally hold the office of POTUS, no more than any other “anchor baby” could. And that’s really all we need to know….PERIOD!
The reason the Founding Fathers insisted on requiring an American President to be “Natural Born” is because of loyalty. Just because a person is born in a certain country, doesn’t necessarily make them loyal to that country. They would be more inclined to adopt their parents beliefs and have loyalty to whatever country their parents did.
Think about it; If you happened to be born in some out of the way foreign country while your parents were traveling on vacation somewhere, and then a week after your birth your parents took you home to America, and you lived your entire life here; where would your allegiances lie? Would you be loyal to some obscure country you know nothing about just because you were born there, or would your heart be with America? What loyalty do some of these anchor babies whose parents are not U.S. citizens have to America? How about a kid that was raised by Communists in Indonesia? Get the picture?
Paul, I sure hope you’re right about Obama not doing the four years. But there’s really nothing to settle. It’s already settled. Obama is not a “Natural Born” citizen, and IS NOT constitutionally eligible to hold the office of POTUS.
Despite the insurmountable evidence to the contrary, let’s give Obama the benefit of the doubt and say he was born here, and not in Mombasa like his grandmama said. Because where he was born is actually irrelevant, unless of course, after we remove him from the office he’s illegally occupying and criminally prosecute him for treason, we want to deport him for being an illegal alien after he finishes serving a long prison sentence too. That’d be kinda cold, even for me!
At this point, it’s quite apparent that Obama’s not going to give up any long form birth certificates or school records as long as he’s in power, but that’s OK, we really don’t need them. Because the most damning evidence against Obama that I know of so far, has been Obama’s own admission that his father was Kenyan, and is also listed as African on the (fabricated) Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) that has been published all over the internet for the past few years.
By virtue of his father being a Kenyan at the time of baby Obammies birth, that makes him the same nationality as his father, which in 1961, would have been a “British Subject”……no matter where he was born. And I’m sure you’ve heard, “Once a Brit, always a Brit!” But if in fact, and that’s a BIG IF, he was born in one of the two different hospitals he claims as his birthplace in Hawaii, he would be considered a “Native Born” citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment, not a “Natural Born” citizen, as required under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States. And being born on American soil with a parent that is a British Subject, he would also be considered a dual citizen, who would still be entitled to all the same rights and privileges in this country as any other American citizen, but just couldn’t ever legally hold the office of POTUS, no more than any other “anchor baby” could. And that’s really all we need to know….PERIOD!
The reason the Founding Fathers insisted on requiring an American President to be “Natural Born” is because of loyalty. Just because a person is born in a certain country, doesn’t necessarily make them loyal to that country. They would be more inclined to adopt their parents beliefs and have loyalty to whatever country their parents did.
Think about it; If you happened to be born in some out of the way foreign country while your parents were traveling on vacation somewhere, and then a week after your birth your parents took you home to America, and you lived your entire life here; where would your allegiances lie? Would you be loyal to some obscure country you know nothing about just because you were born there, or would your heart be with America? What loyalty do some of these anchor babies whose parents are not U.S. citizens have to America? How about a kid that was raised by Communists in Indonesia? Get the picture?
Paul, I sure hope you’re right about Obama not doing the four years. But there’s really nothing to settle. It’s already settled. Obama is not a “Natural Born” citizen, and IS NOT constitutionally eligible to hold the office of POTUS.
Despite the insurmountable evidence to the contrary, let’s give Obama the benefit of the doubt and say he was born here, and not in Mombasa like his grandmama said. Because where he was born is actually irrelevant, unless of course, after we remove him from the office he’s illegally occupying and criminally prosecute him for treason, we want to deport him for being an illegal alien after he finishes serving a long prison sentence too. That’d be kinda cold, even for me!
At this point, it’s quite apparent that Obama’s not going to give up any long form birth certificates or school records as long as he’s in power, but that’s OK, we really don’t need them. Because the most damning evidence against Obama that I know of so far, has been Obama’s own admission that his father was Kenyan, and is also listed as African on the (fabricated) Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) that has been published all over the internet for the past few years.
By virtue of his father being a Kenyan at the time of baby Obammies birth, that makes him the same nationality as his father, which in 1961, would have been a “British Subject”……no matter where he was born. And I’m sure you’ve heard, “Once a Brit, always a Brit!” But if in fact, and that’s a BIG IF, he was born in one of the two different hospitals he claims as his birthplace in Hawaii, he would be considered a “Native Born” citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment, not a “Natural Born” citizen, as required under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States. And being born on American soil with a parent that is a British Subject, he would also be considered a dual citizen, who would still be entitled to all the same rights and privileges in this country as any other American citizen, but just couldn’t ever legally hold the office of POTUS, no more than any other “anchor baby” could. And that’s really all we need to know….PERIOD!
The reason the Founding Fathers insisted on requiring an American President to be “Natural Born” is because of loyalty. Just because a person is born in a certain country, doesn’t necessarily make them loyal to that country. They would be more inclined to adopt their parents beliefs and have loyalty to whatever country their parents did.
Think about it; If you happened to be born in some out of the way foreign country while your parents were traveling on vacation somewhere, and then a week after your birth your parents took you home to America, and you lived your entire life here; where would your allegiances lie? Would you be loyal to some obscure country you know nothing about just because you were born there, or would your heart be with America? What loyalty do some of these anchor babies whose parents are not U.S. citizens have to America? How about a kid that was raised by Communists in Indonesia? Get the picture?
The definition of a “Natural Born” citizen is not embodied in the constitution, but it is in Vattel’s Law of Nations. In this publication, it defines a “Natural Born” citizen as someone that is not only born on American soil, (which includes U.S. Military Bases) but who also has BOTH parents (plural) that are at least “Naturalized” citizens at the time of their birth. So even if Obama was born at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, on top of the “Resolute Desk” in the Oval Office, he could never be considered a “Natural Born” citizen, because his father was never a U.S. citizen.
Besides, why would anyone spend millions of dollars to hide a birth certificate from anyone, when you can quickly and easily get a copy of any birth certificate for around $15 anywhere, unless they had something to hide? My daughter had to show my grandsons birth certificate to register him for Little League, why not Obama? Without a birth certificate, how did he get a drivers license? How did he get a U.S. Passport? Or does he even have one? How did he manage to get 38 different Social Security numbers? (another story for another day)
And in closing, you made reference to Obama being an African American. Obama IS NOT an African American. He’s 50% white, 44% Arab and 6% African. That hardly makes him African, and we’ll have to see about the American part.
If anyone questions any part of this and is interested reading the proof for themselves, they can email at mcmahon351@aol.com and I’ll gladly send you what I’ve got.
Please come and visit us after the 29th of July. We'd love to meet you (and check your documents).
Love, the residents of Arizona.