Los Angeles, CA — California is ground zero for oppressive and unconstitutional gun laws that flagrantly violate the Second Amendment. In this state, the constitutional right to bear arms is practically non-existent, buried under layers of government overreach. However, the tide is turning. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ___, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), has affirmed that the Second Amendment means what it says—and that it cannot be endlessly “balanced” against vague claims of public safety. The future will see most of California’s draconian gun laws wiped from the books.
Gun Dealers Before and After the 1968 Gun Control Act
Before the Gun Control Act of 1968, firearms were sold like any other lawful product. No special licenses were required, no federal purchase forms, and no waiting periods. You could buy a firearm in person, by mail, or from a neighbor without jumping through bureaucratic hoops. So long as the seller had no reason to believe the firearm would be used in a crime, transactions were straightforward and respected personal freedoms.
The Gun Control Act of 1968 changed everything. Federal licensing requirements for dealers created layers of red tape, forcing small businesses to absorb steep compliance costs. Dealers had to operate out of brick-and-mortar locations and hire clerical staff to manage mountains of paperwork. Background checks through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) added even more administrative burdens. All of this drove up the cost of firearms for consumers—and cemented the dealer’s role as a gatekeeper.
Gun Dealers in Restrictive States: Profiting from Your Rights
In states like California, where lawmakers weaponize bureaucracy to strangle the Second Amendment, gun dealers have become, intentionally or not, arms of the government. These restrictive laws mandate that even private transactions—whether a gift, loan, or sale to a friend—must go through a licensed dealer. This means buyers and sellers must pay the dealer for what should be a private transaction.
Even worse, gun laws in these states are often written to maximize profits for dealers. Mandatory training courses, often required for gun ownership, conveniently funnel gun owners into classes run by the same dealers selling the firearms. This creates a perverse financial incentive for some gun dealers to embrace and even lobby for stricter laws.
Gun Dealers in Free States: Respecting the Second Amendment
In contrast, gun dealers in free states operate without the burden of government overreach. There, private individuals can gift, loan, or sell firearms without dealer interference. Gun dealers are not coerced into acting as agents of the state and are free to focus on selling firearms rather than enforcing unconstitutional regulations.
The Reality: Gun Dealers Need to Pick a Side
As gun control laws face growing legal challenges across the country, the role of gun dealers is at a crossroads. Dealers in restrictive states have become complicit in policies that trample individual freedoms while padding their bottom lines. But the Bruendecision makes it clear: gun rights are not negotiable, and the Constitution is not for sale.
In the coming years, as unconstitutional gun laws fall, gun dealers in restrictive states will have to adjust. They must return to their original role—providing firearms to law-abiding citizens—not profiting off government mandates. Those who truly value the Second Amendment will embrace this shift. Those who don’t will be exposed for what they are: profiteers of tyranny.
It’s time to hold gun dealers accountable. The Second Amendment is not just a talking point—it’s the supreme law of the land.
Comments