Skip to main content

State v. Wilson: The Battle Over Public Carry Rights Reaches the Supreme Court

The Second Amendment debate has taken a new turn, and all eyes are now on the U.S. Supreme Court as it considers whether to take on State v. Wilson, a case with the potential to reshape the landscape of gun rights in America. At the heart of the issue is Hawaii’s stringent requirement for permits to carry firearms in public. State v. Wilson poses a significant question: does a state’s licensing requirement infringe upon the Second Amendment right to bear arms? With a scheduled conference on November 1, 2024, this case could mark a major shift—not by expanding gun rights, but by restoring them to the people, where they rightfully belong.

The background of State v. Wilson is rooted in Hawaii’s restrictive stance on public firearm carry, requiring residents to obtain a permit to carry guns outside their homes. The state justifies these measures as essential for public safety, given its unique cultural and legal history. However, opponents argue that these restrictions are unconstitutional, especially in light of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. In Bruen, the Court ruled that gun regulations must be consistent with historical norms and cannot impose undue barriers on the right to bear arms. Many view Hawaii’s permit requirements as a direct contradiction to this precedent.


The impact of a potential Supreme Court ruling in favor of Wilson could extend far beyond Hawaii. Should the Court decide to hear the case and ultimately side with Wilson, it would reinforce a broader trend toward “constitutional carry”—the right to carry a firearm without a permit. Currently, over half of U.S. states have adopted some form of constitutional carry, signaling a movement toward a more permissive approach to public carry rights. A ruling in Wilson’s favor could limit states’ ability to impose restrictive licensing laws, moving the nation closer to a uniform standard that aligns with the Second Amendment as traditionally understood.

If the Supreme Court grants certiorari, this case could set a national precedent by affirming that the right to bear arms in public is indeed fundamental and not subject to restrictive state licensing schemes. For states with strict gun control measures, a decision favoring Wilson could necessitate a reassessment of their laws and bring about a nationwide shift towards constitutional carry.


As the Supreme Court prepares to discuss State v. Wilson on November 1, gun rights advocates and state governments alike are paying close attention. This case stands as a critical test of the balance between state authority and individual rights under the Constitution. While some view the potential outcome as an expansion of gun rights, others see it as a return of these rights to the people—a restoration of freedoms that have long been safeguarded by the Second Amendment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A 40 Caliber Nightmare Is Caught On Tape.

So you’re confident that that .40 caliber S&W service round will keep you safe. Maybe you’ll have second thoughts after you see this video. One hot summer night in 1994 Tempe and Mesa Arizona police were involved in a pursuit with this suspect who ran into a stranger’s apartment to hide after being shot TWICE in the chest. He was shirtless and you can see the blood pumping out of those two wounds. What’s really frightening is just how agile this fellow is as he struts to the ambulance. If he was not handcuffed and had a knife or a gun, ask yourself if he could still hurt you, your partner or a hostage? If your jurisdiction demands that officers carry either the 9MM or the .40 Caliber S&W it’s time to show this video to your bosses and lobby to have the .45 ACP round authorized. The switch may well reduce the screaming by self-appointed community activists about how many rounds police had to use on a suspect. The really talented and courageous video journalist, Karen Ke...

The origin of the feature film, COME FRIDAY…

CLick On the pictures to see full size versions. Long ago there was a young lady I had the hots for in a big way (Yes, I know that hots is not a word). She was pretty, incredibly bright, and had some real elegance about her. She had a love for children and basic kindness that you don’t often see in someone her age. I met her parents and could understand she came from a much more stable home than mine. I was raised by a single, welfare mom and suddenly found myself way out-classed. For whatever reasons things did not workout they way I had hoped. Sadly for me, we went on our separate ways. From time to time I’d run into this lady in various places where our job had taken us. Whenever this happened my heart would skip a beat or two. I left my hometown Chicago, and moved to Arizona where I founded my detective agency. As a private eye and soon a TV news producer too, my career took me to the highest profile criminal events in Arizona and throughout the country. There’s no question that ...

America Will See Its Worst Race Riot Yet This Summer

Star Prosecution Witness, Rachel Jeantel Sanford, FL —Yes, the George Zimmerman trial here has thousands of African-Americans getting ready for some serious bloodletting. I don’t want to make idle and dire predictions but this nation has never been so divided and racially sensitive.  Our African-American President took sides on this case at the very beginning.  That ratified a George Zimmerman guilty verdict in the minds of millions. There’s just one little problem, and that is the murder case should have never been filed.  It was filed purely for political reasons despite the fact that it was a simple justifiable homicide.  Zimmerman was on the block watch lookout program and followed a suspicious Trayvon Martin after he used an improper entrance to a gated community.  Zimmerman was acting as the eyes and ears of the Sanford Police Department. Martin did not like being followed and knew that he could easily beat up the out-of-shape...